July 13, 200619 yr SRT and V With numbers like these, what's not to love? 2 performance divisions 2 rear-drive sedans 2 monster V-8s 2/3 of the "Big Three" 10.5-liters of displacement 894 collective horsepower Enough said. Non-Comparison Test: Chrysler 300C SRT8 and Cadillac STS-V
July 13, 200619 yr For Ford's entry, drop a S/C 5.4 litre under the hood of the Lincoln LS..... oh wait..
July 15, 200619 yr How can they both look so different, yet both so good? Sure the Cadillac is quite the masterpiece to behold, but it is a brand GM is boosting in order to get it back in rankings with Mercedes-Benz and Audi. Personally, I'd like one of each. But if I had to choose one, it would be: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 A member of the family that produced: Motor Trend's 2005 Car of the Year Automobile Magazine's 2005 All-Star Edited July 15, 200619 yr by MyerShift
July 20, 200619 yr I'll take an STS-V, thank you very much! 166600[/snapback] Untill you find out that the STS-V cost twice as much.
July 26, 200619 yr Untill you find out that the STS-V cost twice as much. 169184[/snapback] It's a win/win scenario. If you can afford the STS-V then great... you get more car for more $. If you can't afford an STS-V then the Chrysler 300C is not exactly something I'd mind driving. Now if it was me I'd take neither, the less expensive, more simplistic & more driver-orianted CTS-V with its true manual 6-speed & no nonsense pushrod.
July 26, 200619 yr For Ford's entry, drop a S/C 5.4 litre under the hood of the Lincoln LS..... oh wait.. 166421[/snapback] It's too bad they didn't SVT-ise the LS... I saw an LS last year with the '93 Cobra 4.6 DOHC drivetrain, sounded pretty sweet...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.