SRT and V

With numbers like these, what's not to love?

2 performance divisions

2 rear-drive sedans

2 monster V-8s

2/3 of the "Big Three"

10.5-liters of displacement

894 collective horsepower

Enough said.

Non-Comparison Test: Chrysler 300C SRT8 and Cadillac STS-V

Cool article.. Plus, they took some really nice pics.

I would LOVE to own an STS-V!

I'll take both or either!

Can I have both but trade the STS-V for the XLR-V?? (Hey it is worth a try!)

For Ford's entry, drop a S/C 5.4 litre under the hood of the Lincoln LS..... oh wait..

I'll take an STS-V, thank you very much!

How can they both look so different, yet both so good?

Sure the Cadillac is quite the masterpiece to behold, but it is a brand GM is boosting in order to get it back in rankings with Mercedes-Benz and Audi.

Personally, I'd like one of each.

But if I had to choose one, it would be:

Chrysler 300C SRT-8

A member of the family that produced:

Motor Trend's 2005 Car of the Year

Automobile Magazine's 2005 All-Star

Edited July 15, 200619 yr by MyerShift

I'll take an STS-V, thank you very much!

166600[/snapback]

Untill you find out that the STS-V cost twice as much.

Untill you find out that the STS-V cost twice as much.

169184[/snapback]

It's a win/win scenario. If you can afford the STS-V then great... you get more

car for more $. If you can't afford an STS-V then the Chrysler 300C is not

exactly something I'd mind driving. Now if it was me I'd take neither, the less

expensive, more simplistic & more driver-orianted CTS-V with its true manual

6-speed & no nonsense pushrod.

For Ford's entry, drop a S/C 5.4 litre under the hood of the Lincoln LS..... oh wait..

166421[/snapback]

It's too bad they didn't SVT-ise the LS... I saw an LS last year with the '93 Cobra 4.6 DOHC drivetrain, sounded pretty sweet...