Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

2007 HUMMER H2

Posted Image

New for 2007

*Limited edition Glacier Blue Metallic H2

*All Terrain Blue exterior color

*Optional rear-vision camera system

Click for More HUMMER H2 Info @ GM Media

--------------------------------------------------------------

2007 HUMMER H3

Posted Image

New for 2007

*Vortec 3.7L I-5 inline five cylinder with 242 horsepower (180 kW) at 5600 rpm* and 242 lb ft. of torque (328 Nm) at 4600 rpm*

*H3X model with chrome elements and two exclusive colors

*StabiliTrak now standard on all H3 models, previously standard only on automatic

*Chrome wheel for 33-inch tire

*Midnight Blue exterior finish replaces Superior Blue, and Shadow Green exterior discontinued

*Ebony/Green cloth interior is discontinued

Click for More HUMMER H3 Info @ GM Media

--------------------------------------------------------------

2007 HUMMER Accessories

Posted Image

Chrome tubular assist steps – H3

Posted Image

Rear vision system camera/monitor – H2

Wow, that camera vision system monitor looks cool... But they got rid of the ebony/green interior... I thought it looked awesome and kept with the ruggedness of this vehicle.

Sadly, the H3's city fuel economy went down from 16 MPG to 15 with the added displacement. That's pretty bad when you consider that the 320-hp Tahoe gets 16 (and the FJ Cruiser 19).

Sadly, the H3's city fuel economy went down from 16 MPG to 15 with the added displacement. That's pretty bad when you consider that the 320-hp Tahoe gets 16 (and the FJ Cruiser 19).

176351[/snapback]

not when you consider the tahoe is more aerodynamic and NOT built to be the off-road beast the H3 is. Also the FJ cruiser is lighter, smaller, and uglier than the H3.

Ya, the tires alone (285 bridgestone duelers) will create a huge amount of difference. But, it's perception too. If someone sees that it has an I-5, they'll think about efficiency, regardless of the rating. If you see "V8" people think it's a gas guzzler. Again, an issue of perception.

Sadly, the H3's city fuel economy went down from 16 MPG to 15 with the added displacement. That's pretty bad when you consider that the 320-hp Tahoe gets 16 (and the FJ Cruiser 19).

176351[/snapback]

You're comparing apples to oranges. You can't compare the city mileage of the H3 to the highway mileage of the FJ. The way you made that statement makes it sound like the FJ gets 4 mpg better than the H3 in the city, which it doesn't.

You're comparing apples to oranges. You can't compare the city mileage of the H3 to the highway mileage of the FJ. The way you made that statement makes it sound like the FJ gets 4 mpg better than the H3 in the city, which it doesn't.

176813[/snapback]

My bad... fueleconomy.gov says 19/22 (city/highway), but on Toyota's own site, it's 18/22 (RWD) and 17/21 (4WD).

Sadly, the H3's city fuel economy went down from 16 MPG to 15 with the added displacement. That's pretty bad when you consider that the 320-hp Tahoe gets 16 (and the FJ Cruiser 19).

176351[/snapback]

Hummer+Hummer buyer=Couldn't care less about fuel economy.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Who's Online (See full list)

  • There are no registered users currently online