I find the exterior (especially the coupe) to be okay, in a Chrysler cab-forward kind of way. However, that interior is so splendidly revolting, that I wouldn't ever want this generation of Civic!

And seriously...NAV would not big a big selling option. Probably one in a thousand civics will be produced with NAV and its just used for promotions to make all the nerds drool.

You're missing the point, guys... It should atleast be offered for those that want it. Whether that's a small number or not shouldn't matter. It helps the perception of the vehicle. Not even offering it is retarded... For whatever reason; good enough without it, etc. If you disagree, you're a retard. End of story. "Good enough never is."

[post="14364"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]

BV is right! Nav should at least be offered for those that want it! Both Honda and Toyota advertize the Nav systems in their vehicles.

I have a Nav in CTS and the Trailblazer. They are toys that I wanted, no matter what the cost. Who cares! Still I use it quite a bit. I worked for 35 years and now that I'm retired, I should be able to buy what I want.

Besides, none of my friends have Nav systems and whoever has the most toys wins.

So far, I'm in second place to the brother-in-law with 2 plasma TV's, but he doesn't have a Nav system, just an SSR.

The Euro 5 door Hatchback is really nice. I wish they offered it over here. I only thing I don't like is the headlights, I wish they were more like the USDM Si.

[post="14418"][/post]

I'd feel like I was piloting a shuttle pod from Star Trek!!!

NAV should be offered simply because it could be a high profit option for GM that acutally has value to the customer.

I saw one on the road today... it's not as bad, but it is still no looker.