October 2, 200718 yr 2008 Suzuki SX4 sedan. Great value for the money. A nice, neatly optioned little car. Only catch: it looks mildly retarded from a side profile. Would you believe $20,095 CAD for this: Look at all the stuff you get:
October 2, 200718 yr I don't care for the sedan...it looks too stubby and tall like most small cars...but as a hatch I think it looks pretty good.
October 2, 200718 yr I don't care for the sedan...it looks too stubby and tall like most small cars...but as a hatch I think it looks pretty good.I guess that's why they make so many flavors. I prefer the styling of the sedan to the "stubby" hatchback.Here's the last new car event I attended...and the SX4 was there as well: http://www.carspace.com/hudsonthedog/Albums/2007IMPATestDay/
October 2, 200718 yr The AWD feature is awesome for a small car...is it available in the sedan? Edited October 2, 200718 yr by Dodgefan
October 2, 200718 yr there was a SX4 hatchback parked outside my office this morning, and i have to say it's pretty neat! small hatchback with some SUV styling cues works well here. the sedan, on the opther hand, suffers from an odd rear-end look.
October 2, 200718 yr there was a SX4 hatchback parked outside my office this morning, and i have to say it's pretty neat! small hatchback with some SUV styling cues works well here. the sedan, on the opther hand, suffers from an odd rear-end look.I have just the opposite reaction. I think the rear end of the hatchback is far more "odd" than the sedan, which I think is particularly attractive.
October 2, 200718 yr Not a fan of tall, stubby sedans either. I know they're all about getting the most interior / trunk space, but I miss the days when compact sedans used to look good proportionally. I'd give up a few cubic feet of trunk space and interior room for something that didn't look so goofy. As for hatchbacks, I like them more than these compact sedans because they look a little more "normal" without stubby trunks and goofy notchback rear ends.
October 2, 200718 yr Not a fan of tall, stubby sedans either. I know they're all about getting the most interior / trunk space, but I miss the days when compact sedans used to look good proportionally. I'd give up a few cubic feet of trunk space and interior room for something that didn't look so goofy. As for hatchbacks, I like them more than these compact sedans because they look a little more "normal" without stubby trunks and goofy notchback rear ends. I can understand that opinion. No problems here.I, personally, prefer small cars to NOT look like small big cars. I don't mind it when small cars have different proportions than their larger siblings. When the domestics started making small cars, they were simply downsized large cars instead of clean-sheet designs. I like the SX4 sedan on its own merits. I also like the proportions of the Suzuki Verona...which I find very attractive.
October 2, 200718 yr The AWD feature is awesome or a small car...is it available in the sedan? AWD is standard, which is what makes it so crazy that it does not outsell the $h!ty Corolla & Civic about 20:1.
October 2, 200718 yr I wish AWD was available on this sedan. It does look mildly retarded, but the ground effects and big rims also make it look somewhat beefy. Looks like a heck of a value.
October 3, 200718 yr AWD is standard, which is what makes it so crazy that it does not outsell the $h!ty Corolla & Civic about 20:1. Cause it's much smaller than the "$h!ty" Corollas and Civics, and it has worst resale value, and not big of a brand recognition.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.