October 12, 200520 yr http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors External links Official Website GMAC Financial Services GMability, GM's corporate responsibility site GM's K-12 education site GM's Fastlane Blog Corporate history GMInsidenews GM Enthusiast forum General Motors Holden VL Turbo Cheers & Gears GM Enthusiast forum Edited October 12, 200520 yr by evok
June 19, 200619 yr wikipedia = meh. GMI is also off, but maddeningly enough, Roger & Me is still up there, assumedly as some sort of factual reference. Who votes for that to be removed?? 3 yes's and it's gone....
June 19, 200619 yr Its still on there...or on there again, or whatever: External links Official Website GMability, GM's corporate responsibility site GM's K-12 education site Corporate history General Motors Holden VL Turbo Cheers & Gears, GM Enthusiast forum GM picture galleries Automotive industry portal with General Motor news GM 2006 VIN chart. GM Sponsored Competition
June 20, 200619 yr wikipedia = meh. GMI is also off, but maddeningly enough, Roger & Me is still up there, assumedly as some sort of factual reference. Who votes for that to be removed?? 3 yes's and it's gone.... [post="154864"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post] Wow, you really don't like Wikipedia! I think it's very informative, even if it is a free encyclopedia that anyone can add stuff to. Well, to each his own. Edited June 20, 200619 yr by corvette_dude729
June 20, 200619 yr Like everything on the Internet, it must be taken with a grain of salt. I think it shouldn't be used as a reference for any kind of serious research, but for my own information it's great.
June 20, 200619 yr Wow, you really don't like Wikipedia! I think it's very informative, even if it is a free encyclopedia that anyone can add stuff to. Well, to each his own. I've had running arguments with people there who've been clearly in the wrong ('The '48 Tucker is a V-6!'), and I can smell the reasons thru the phone lines: 'I'm a regular contributor, I don't know who you are but as the self-appointed WikiSentry, I must revert your edit!'. Other times the editorial agendas come thru loud & clear, requiring extensive number crunching to prove to them they are, as known before checking, wrong again. Like dart sez- for general overviews it's fine, but for specific info- don't make any bets using Wiki as your proof. {...goes off to see if last night's wiki edit was F-ed with...} Edited June 20, 200619 yr by balthazar
June 23, 200619 yr somehow i cant see how this site is on there and cz28 isnt... that is far much larger community of GM enthusiasts... but there are quite unfactual information on that website... example, the cadillac 16 was powered by basically 2 northstars... when if i remember correctly it was 2 ls1's
June 23, 200619 yr somehow i cant see how this site is on there and cz28 isnt... that is far much larger community of GM enthusiasts... but there are quite unfactual information on that website... example, the cadillac 16 was powered by basically 2 northstars... when if i remember correctly it was 2 ls1's [post="156591"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post] going from memory, i thought it was all new????? wasn't it 13.1l or something like that?
June 23, 200619 yr somehow i cant see how this site is on there and cz28 isnt... that is far much larger community of GM enthusiasts... [post="156591"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camaro See 'External links'
June 23, 200619 yr somehow i cant see how this site is on there and cz28 isnt... that is far much larger community of GM enthusiasts... but there are quite unfactual information on that website... example, the cadillac 16 was powered by basically 2 northstars... when if i remember correctly it was 2 ls1's [post="156591"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post] It was a 13.6L OHV VVT DOD V16 90 degree block. It had a single intake manifold, which must have been huge. You could say it was 2 6.8L V8s, which I think was the rumored displacement of the C6 Z06 engine, but that got changed as we all know. The XV12 was a 750 hp DOHC V12 that was N* based if I remember right it was 7.5L It also had DOD, a pretty cool concept on a DOHC engine. Also remember the 4.3L XV8 a 75 degree V8 that was DI, VVT, Twin cam in block, and 3 valve headed. That engine sounds really, really cool.
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.