April 3, 200817 yr linkity Update: Saw on the Toronto news today that the judge overturned the ticket, this car is legal. Edited April 4, 200817 yr by the_yellow_dart
April 3, 200817 yr should they have been wearing helmets? lol not like they were going out on the highway or something.
April 3, 200817 yr should they have been wearing helmets? lol not like they were going out on the highway or something. The thing didn't even have a plate, let alone lights or a rear window. These folks were asking for it.
April 3, 200817 yr Exactly... if they want to pedal a car good for them... but it should pass safety insepction and be registered/insured
April 3, 200817 yr Exactly... if they want to pedal a car good for them... but it should pass safety insepction and be registered/insured A rudimentary safety inspection (at least brake lights & good tie rods) & mandatory slow lane around town. Then they'd have my blessing. On the one hand it's a waste of a perfectly good BOF/RWD Buick but I think it's kind of a cool concept. Seems like they lightened up the car quite a bit... a lightweight unibody 4dr sedan might have been a better starting point. Perhaps even a Park Ave? Edited April 3, 200817 yr by Sixty8panther
April 3, 200817 yr On the one hand it's a waste of a perfectly good BOF/RWD Buick but I think it's kind of a cool concept. Seems like they lightened up the car quite a bit... a lightweight unibody 4dr sedan might have been a better starting point. Perhaps even a Park Ave? yes, but i wonder... a BOF might have been the best choice because they cut the floor out.. i dont wanna see a unibody car with the floor cut!
April 3, 200817 yr yes, but i wonder... a BOF might have been the best choice because they cut the floor out.. i dont wanna see a unibody car with the floor cut! o\ /o :AH-HA_wink:
April 3, 200817 yr The people that did this are from Toronto, which explains a lot... Chris What are you trying to say Chris?
April 4, 200817 yr Oh I SO, SO have to send this to my brother who drives an '86 Regal LTD daily Oil burning 307 and all...he could convert it to a pedal car!
April 4, 200817 yr The thing didn't even have a plate, let alone lights or a rear window. These folks were asking for it. it looks like a bike, but has a motor in it... plates license required (motor cycle) it is a bike, a 5 year old could ride it down a street obeying traffic laws. (real bike) yes, it's bigger, can cause injury... inspect it for brakes then who gives a $#!T. do 4 wheels constitute making it a "car".. is it the engine, is it the size, ... prolly not, just because it's on public roads is why he got the ticket....? making it have a plate makes it sound like ... it's supposed to be more than just an...oddity. it's like saying that parade floats should have plates visible, lights and a rear windshield. it just seems outrageous to me, even if it is just for the safety of the occupants that willingly jumped into the car.. [sarcasm] cause it's definitely gonna be going out in bad weather / after dark.[/sarcasm] anyway... i wonder how light the thing is, and how fast some very good bikers cold get it to go....it is a 5speed the guy said.
April 4, 200817 yr Here's another point to ponder: would you rather be inside this "car" that actually surrounds you with some metal, spartan as it may be, or would you (again, worst case scenario) rather get hit while on a bicycle? I think we all know which is safer, so then the question becomes: how can we do a basic rudimentary safety inspection and they're good to go, same as anyone else on a bike or other human powered contraption. Here's an idea: Lightweight electric car that you can peddle in to help charge the batteries via oversized generator/alternator....
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.