May 1, 200817 yr BMW Group Reports April Sales WOODCLIFF LAKE, N.J., May 1 /PRNewswire/Link to Press Release BMW Group (BMW and MINI combined) US sales up 9.6 percent in April. Year-to-date sales are down 4 percent. WOODCLIFF LAKE, N.J., May 1 /PRNewswire/ -- The BMW Group in the U.S. (BMW and MINI combined) today reported April vehicle sales of 31,448, an increase of 9.6 percent from the 28,692 vehicles sold in the same month of 2007. For the first four months of 2008, BMW Group sales are still down 4.0 percent, to 99,977 vehicles versus the 104,125 sold January through April of 2007. Among other factors, April sales results were positively affected by new products all launched this spring (BMW M3, BMW X6, BMW 1 Series, MINI Clubman). BMW Brand Sales BMW brand sales were up 5.6 percent, to 26,735 vehicles compared to 25,310 vehicles sold in April 2007. Year-to-date, BMW reported sales of 85,100 vehicles compared to the 92,670 reported in the same period a year ago, a decline of 8.2 percent. BMW Automobile Sales Monthly sales of BMW brand automobiles increased 3.2 percent in April, to 20,930 versus 20,290 in 2007. Year-to-date, BMW automobile sales are down 6.7 percent to 67,083 versus 71,906 reported in the same period last year. BMW Sports Activity Vehicles Sales of BMW Sports Activity Vehicles were up 15.6 percent for the month, to 5,805 vehicles compared to the 5,020 reported in April 2007. Year-to-date, BMW SAV sales are down 13.2 percent to 18,017 vehicles from 20,764 in 2007. MINI Brand Sales MINI USA reported a 39.4 percent increase in April sales, to 4,713 cars compared to 3,382 cars sold in the same period a year ago. MINI USA also reported sales of 14,877 for the first four months of 2008, an increase of 29.9 percent over the 11,455 sold in the same period a year ago.Table: Sales BMW of North America, LLC, April 2008April April % YTD YTD % 2008 2007 2008 2007 BMW brand 26,735 25,310 5.6 85,100 92,670 -8.2 BMW passenger cars 20,930 20,290 3.2 67,083 71,906 -6.7 BMW light trucks (SAVs) 5,805 5,020 15.6 18,017 20,764 -13.2 MINI brand 4,713 3,382 39.4 14,877 11,455 29.9 TOTAL Group 31,448 28,692 9.6 99,977 104,125 -4.0 BMW Certified Pre-Owned BMW Certified Pre-Owned CPO sales were up 25.4 percent in April, to 9,237 over the 7,368 reported in the same month a year ago. Year-to-date, the division reported sales of 34,461 automobiles, an increase of 30.7 percent, compared to the 26,376 vehicles reported in the first four months of 2007. BMW Group In America BMW of North America, LLC has been present in the United States since 1975. Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC began distributing vehicles in 2003. The BMW Group in the United States has grown to include marketing, sales, and financial service organizations for the BMW brand of motor vehicles, including motorcycles, the MINI brand, and the Rolls-Royce brand of Motor Cars; DesignworksUSA, an industrial design firm in California; a technology office in Silicon Valley and various other operations throughout the country. BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC in South Carolina is part of BMW Group's global manufacturing network and is the exclusive manufacturing plant for all Z4 models, X5 Sports Activity Vehicles and X6 Sport Activity Coupes. The BMW Group sales organization is represented in the U.S. through networks of 338 BMW passenger car centers, 335 BMW Sports Activity Vehicle centers, 142 BMW motorcycle retailers, 82 MINI passenger car dealers, and 30 Rolls-Royce Motor Car dealers. BMW (US) Holding Corp., the BMW Group's sales headquarters for North, Central and South America, is located in Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey. Information about BMW Group products is available to consumers via the Internet at:http://www.bmwgroupna.comhttp://www.bmwusa.comhttp://www.bmwmotorcycles.comhttp://www.miniusa.comhttp://www.rolls-roycemotorcars.comSales BMW of North America, LLC, April 2008 YTD YTD April 08 April 07 % April 08 April 07 % 1 Series 1125 0 2621 0 3 Series 11,401 13,142 -13.2% 38,414 46,335 -17.1% Z4 Roadster and Coupe 1,021 911 12.1% 2,680 2,817 -4.9% 5 Series 4,783 3,592 33.2% 15,673 14,720 6.5% 6 Series 1,006 802 25.4% 2,422 2,723 -11.1% 7 Series 1,594 1,843 -13.5% 5,273 5,311 -0.7% BMW passenger cars 20,930 20,290 3.2% 67,083 71,906 -6.7% X3 1,777 2,307 -23.0% 5,967 8,981 -33.6% X5 3,373 2,713 24.3% 11,395 11,783 -3.3% X6 655 0 655 0 BMW light trucks (SAVs) 5,805 5,020 15.6% 18,017 20,764 -13.2% BMW brand 26,735 25,310 5.6% 85,100 92,670 -8.2% Cooper Hardtop 3,083 2,716 13.5% 10,250 9,282 10.4% Cooper Convertible 651 666 -2.3% 1,880 2,173 -13.5% Cooper Clubman 979 0 2,747 0 MINI brand 4,713 3,382 39.4% 14,877 11,455 29.9% TOTAL BMW of North America, LLC 31,448 28,692 9.6% 99,977 104,125 -4.0%
May 1, 200817 yr 1-Series cannibalizing 3er sales, or are 3er sales just down because of the competition (CTS, C-Class, G35) being newer?
May 1, 200817 yr 1-Series cannibalizing 3er sales, or are 3er sales just down because of the competition (CTS, C-Class, G35) being newer? Probably being cannibalized......but that's something, I'm sure, BMW had counted on....... 3-Series gets a MCE in '09......so that will help.....
May 3, 200817 yr YTD BMW passenger car and SAV sales down... MINI sales up. 29/36 mpg *and* fun driving dynamics, anyone?
May 3, 200817 yr With the potential of a BMW/GM engine deal in the works, I really would like to see more cooperation between BMW and GM to the point where BMW becomes a strategic partner of GM. Having my favorite two auto makers working together makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
May 3, 200817 yr Didn't BMW and GM already cooperate on hybrid tech? With BMW (thankfully) remaining committed to RWD, and a staunch champion of the inline-6 engine, which GM division would receive the BMW engine? It would have to be Cadillac, because GM has totally pussied out on RWD, by and large, everywhere else (meaning Pontiac, I presume).
May 3, 200817 yr Didn't BMW and GM already cooperate on hybrid tech? With BMW (thankfully) remaining committed to RWD, and a staunch champion of the inline-6 engine, which GM division would receive the BMW engine? It would have to be Cadillac, because GM has totally pussied out on RWD, by and large, everywhere else (meaning Pontiac, I presume). I thought that the deal was for BMW's V8?
May 3, 200817 yr YTD BMW passenger car and SAV sales down... MINI sales up. 29/36 mpg *and* fun driving dynamics, anyone? That can't be: the Mini is FWD :AH-HA_wink:
May 3, 200817 yr That can't be: the Mini is FWD :AH-HA_wink: Some FWD models are fun to drive...they aren't all generic transportation devices..
May 3, 200817 yr Some FWD models are fun to drive...they aren't all generic transportation devices.. I drive a Mini. I was being sarcastic, hence the :AH-HA_wink: smiley Edited May 3, 200817 yr by ZL-1
May 3, 200817 yr I thought that the deal was for BMW's V8? Supposedly it is. The inline 6 doesn't make sense on a whole bunch of levels...I could see alot of good coming from upgrading to the 5l BMW V8 in current North* applications.
May 3, 200817 yr Supposedly it is. The inline 6 doesn't make sense on a whole bunch of levels...I could see alot of good coming from upgrading to the 5l BMW V8 in current North* applications. It doesn't look like GM is going to have any need for the BMW V8 until either the CTS moves up in class (2010) or the DT7 or whatever they call it arrives. SRX is dead, STS is dead, XLR I suppose could use it though... still that's like 4k engines per year, not very much. BRX won't need it, BTS or whatever it is called won't need it. The super sedan that's rumored to be above DT7, which doesn't make much sense to me (3er=BTS, 5er=CTS, 7er=DT7) could also use it, but who knows when (if) that will ever happen. Anyways, what I'm getting at is maybe GM is trying to do some sort of partnership with BMW on the next-gen V8 for both companies, because it doesn't seem like Cadillac has much need for BMW V8s unless they plan on using them for a year or two in the SRX, STS, and XLR, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, especially sense those products don't sell very well.
May 3, 200817 yr Shoot, I wasn't even thinking of BMW's V8 in this transaction. Why would I, when GM has the best V8 engine in the world, the Chevrolet Smallblock?
May 3, 200817 yr Shoot, I wasn't even thinking of BMW's V8 in this transaction. Why would I, when GM has the best V8 engine in the world, the Chevrolet Smallblock? That engine would be inapropriate for luxury cars, though.
May 3, 200817 yr It doesn't look like GM is going to have any need for the BMW V8 until either the CTS moves up in class (2010) or the DT7 or whatever they call it arrives. SRX is dead, STS is dead, XLR I suppose could use it though... still that's like 4k engines per year, not very much. BRX won't need it, BTS or whatever it is called won't need it. The super sedan that's rumored to be above DT7, which doesn't make much sense to me (3er=BTS, 5er=CTS, 7er=DT7) could also use it, but who knows when (if) that will ever happen. Anyways, what I'm getting at is maybe GM is trying to do some sort of partnership with BMW on the next-gen V8 for both companies, because it doesn't seem like Cadillac has much need for BMW V8s unless they plan on using them for a year or two in the SRX, STS, and XLR, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, especially sense those products don't sell very well. The last part of your post is the reason I think it has a chance of being true...re-upping N* or adjusting the vette block for certain applications may simply not make sense...better to build (plenty of room in GM plants) & buy some of your production run from BMW, rather than developing or furthering a dead end in GM's family tree. Or it could simply have to do with the BMW V8 being developed with the two-mode RWD car application, thus allowing quick Caddy hybrids where the pricing isn't as much of an issue & getting a sweet BMW V8. Edited May 3, 200817 yr by enzl
May 3, 200817 yr moltar, what? Cadillac's most powerful production car ever is powered by that engine. When it came to horsepower, the Northstar was put on the bench. And I'm willing to bet the Smallblock will get better fuel mileage in any application than the Northstar.
May 4, 200817 yr The last part of your post is the reason I think it has a chance of being true...re-upping N* or adjusting the vette block for certain applications may simply not make sense...better to build (plenty of room in GM plants) & buy some of your production run from BMW, rather than developing or furthering a dead end in GM's family tree. Or it could simply have to do with the BMW V8 being developed with the two-mode RWD car application, thus allowing quick Caddy hybrids where the pricing isn't as much of an issue & getting a sweet BMW V8. The hybrid point is a good one. Perhaps already being in partnership with BMW on the 2-mode (I believe they are working on 4-mode now) hybrids probably gave BMW a reason to try to help GM out while GM helps BMW out. The cost of the 2- and 4-modes and new V8s can be split and developed much faster, most likely. The Northstar is definitely out of date by now, and it's time for a completely new engine. I don't think luxury car buyers are going to be accepting of a small block, either. Too bad the UV8 program was apparently such a mess, but there's nothing wrong with developing engines with BMW.
May 4, 200817 yr moltar, what? Cadillac's most powerful production car ever is powered by that engine. When it came to horsepower, the Northstar was put on the bench. And I'm willing to bet the Smallblock will get better fuel mileage in any application than the Northstar. True, but the CTS-v is really an anomaly...luxury car buyers in general expect a modern OHC engine in a luxury car. If GM is going to try and seriously compete in the big leagues for regular luxury cars, they need a modern OHC V8...
May 4, 200817 yr Shoot, I wasn't even thinking of BMW's V8 in this transaction. Why would I, when GM has the best V8 engine in the world, the Chevrolet Smallblock? I've driven a hell of a lot of other manufacturer's V8 engines......and the BMW V8 is one of my absolute favorites. Revvy, yet torquey, and incredibly smooth and silent. GM's smallblock is great....but even the much-vaunted LS-variants can't match the bimmer V8 for luxury applications....it's simply way more mannerly.
May 4, 200817 yr If GM is going to try and seriously compete in the big leagues for regular luxury cars, they need a modern OHC V8... Agreed....in a BIG way..... And yeah....the inline 6s wouldn't work for packaging reasons among other things......but damn, what a great 6cyl engine, huh?
May 4, 200817 yr True, but the CTS-v is really an anomaly...luxury car buyers in general expect a modern OHC engine in a luxury car. If GM is going to try and seriously compete in the big leagues for regular luxury cars, they need a modern OHC V8... yup
May 4, 200817 yr Agreed....in a BIG way..... And yeah....the inline 6s wouldn't work for packaging reasons among other things......but damn, what a great 6cyl engine, huh? Yes, I love their 6s....I miss my M3..
May 4, 200817 yr I stopped by the local BMW dealer again today and a bit of drool ran down my chin as I took in the tiny, sexy, spunky 128.
May 5, 200817 yr YTD BMW passenger car and SAV sales down... MINI sales up. 29/36 mpg *and* fun driving dynamics, anyone? I think this is going to be our next car perhaps...I just LOVE this car in the same sort of way that I love old GM muscle cars... Chris
May 5, 200817 yr I stopped by the local BMW dealer again today and a bit of drool ran down my chin as I took in the tiny, sexy, spunky 128. BMW...there BAAACK. I haven't been as excited about a BMW since the E-30 M3 of the 1980's... The one series is just awesome. First the Volvo C-30 and now this. Europe is building some great small cars! Chris
May 5, 200817 yr With the potential of a BMW/GM engine deal in the works, I really would like to see more cooperation between BMW and GM to the point where BMW becomes a strategic partner of GM. Having my favorite two auto makers working together makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside. It would be a cool partnership...but I think Oldsmoboi wouldn't be happy about it. Chris
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.