April 3, 200916 yr http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Featu...cleId=145166#10 Umm? not bad... I guess?
April 3, 200916 yr It looks fine until you get past the B-pillar, then it all goes to hell. The interior is nice though.
April 3, 200916 yr It looks fine until you get past the B-pillar, then it all goes to hell. So what you're saying is that if it were pillarless, it would be better looking? Great, now this thread is going to be inundated with hundred of pictures of 1972 Chryslers.
April 3, 200916 yr So what you're saying is that if it were pillarless, it would be better looking? Great, now this thread is going to be inundated with hundred of pictures of 1972 Chryslers. haha! Ok fine, it has a hump back and a saggy ass.
April 3, 200916 yr OK... sorta... for a sedan Not so sure it's ok for a Porsche though. The already sold out with the Cayenne, might as well expand a bit more.
April 3, 200916 yr The already sold out with the Cayenne, might as well expand a bit more. And now they have a baby Cayenne coming in 2012. So as long there is "Sport" in a moniker Porsche will build it - their new philosophy. Expect a Sport Truck soon from them.
April 3, 200916 yr I like it, it's certainly better looking and more PORSCHE like then their stupid Cayene. That thing is dumb.... I guess a boxter had a love child with a Lexus RX330. This is a neat concept and I think it's a fantastic car, it would be much cooler still if it were REAR-engined, in other words a 4-dr 911, "cooler" still if it were air-cooled. (yeah, yeah... 10 years too late) Back in the mid-1990s as a kid in High School I drew several sketches of 4-door 911s.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.