January 10, 200620 yr Author WMJ... I said ME Beauties... not ME Garbage. Razor has the right idea... Edited January 10, 200620 yr by blackviper8891
January 10, 200620 yr The Origionals ? 60's 63 904 GTS 63 250 P 64 250 LM 64 Ford GT prototype to be cont.......
January 10, 200620 yr Who gives a $h! about overpriced import "exotics" when the Camaro concept that wil become a production car & a reality for me to be able to purchase is hotter than 100% of the cars in this thread. That's honestly the way I feel. F40? 904GTS? Gallardo? MR2!?!? all weak for the asking price. [/asshole]
January 10, 200620 yr 67 GT40 MkIV & friends at 67 LeMan, #1 w/Dan Gurney/AJ Foyte won 67 206 Dino 67 Alfa Tipo 33 67 Detomaso Vallelunga 67 XP 880 Astro II, Chevrolet mid-engine Corvette proposal 68 XP-882 mid-engine gull-wing Corvette prototype - 'Aerovette' 69 Detomaso Mangusta 69 XP-895 extensively modified XP-882 (1 of the 2 built), Reynolds Aluminum alloy body all in all Id say 6 great years B)
January 10, 200620 yr Who gives a $h! about overpriced import "exotics" when the Camaro concept that wil become a production car & a reality for me to be able to purchase is hotter than 100% of the cars in this thread. That's honestly the way I feel. F40? 904GTS? Gallardo? MR2!?!? all weak for the asking price. [/asshole] boy thats some attitude picture boy....did I give that to you on any of your extensive posts ?..................did I ?
January 10, 200620 yr Author boy thats some attitude picture boy....did I give that to you on any of your extensive posts ?..................did I ? Sixty8... just don't post in these instances. People do have other passions that what you do, you know. I love ME cars... So... go elsewhere. Damn, that pisses me off. I feel like saying more, but I'm trying to hold back from verbally assaulting you. God...
January 10, 200620 yr I should be verbally assaulting all of you...you horrible horrible people... leaving out the M1...shame on you all
January 11, 200620 yr Author Sorry, Nick... Also, to everybody... Don't post unless you have something to add, unlike Sixty8... Mmmkay?
January 11, 200620 yr Is saying that the Esprit(2nd pic in BV's above post) and Atlantique(3rd pic) are beautiful adding something?
January 11, 200620 yr I should take some pics of my friends 914...its a pretty sick car...if only it was in running condition, I think it needs a new tranny, among other things...it has a fair amount of work done to it...I guess the guy who had it before tracked it...It handles like no other, but the engine is gutless. Needs a 350 swap :AH-HA_wink: Edited January 11, 200620 yr by Nick
January 11, 200620 yr (the most beautiful of all Testarossas) (the most beautiful of all Super Ferraris) (the most beautiful of all modern Ferraris) (the most badass of all Super Ferraris) (just plain badass) (just plain beautiful)
January 11, 200620 yr turbojett. This is not the place for pornography!! Some people open this at work, and we don't want them drooling on keyboards.
January 13, 200620 yr turbojett. This is not the place for pornography!! Some people open this at work, and we don't want them drooling on keyboards. sorreeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!
January 13, 200620 yr The guy was doing well with this post, then went and got himself banned....oh well....
January 13, 200620 yr No, the stupid chav wanker scewed up this post too...Sure, AM's are beautiful cars, but this is a mid engined beauties thread.
January 14, 200620 yr Someone got banned and I missed it ??????// Well they darn well oughta been, posting front engined sports cars on a mid engine beautys thred when we have a new Camaro and no one could give a damn.......with murderous yard cruisers runnin loose...... no less...............geeze
January 14, 200620 yr its all about this bad ass i think it spanks on the cien in almost every way ( not to be dissin gm) and how can you go with out the FASTEST PRODUCTION CAR IN THE WORLD this vector used to be the fastest car in the world, back in the day... Edited January 14, 200620 yr by Fijian
January 14, 200620 yr hey. wait a minute... these are mid-fronts (as were C5's). do these count, or are we talking stictly about cars that you have to lean over the back bumper to sevice?
January 14, 200620 yr hey. wait a minute... these are mid-fronts (as were C5's). do these count, or are we talking stictly about cars that you have to lean over the back bumper to sevice? Nope, not midengined, they are front engined. Mid engine is behind passenger compartment, infront of axle. "midship" easily identified by greater distance from rear of door to axle, which in most cases is at the very back of the cars with little to no overhang. Behind the axle front mount easily identifiable by the long nose, great distance from back of tire to front of door, no "cab forward" there. All front engined sports cars have been behind the front axle mount, since the early Ferraris or Alfas.....even earlier with say like American Auburns or you name it, all old cars, sports cars or not had the front axle pushed to the front, nothing new there. I believe even the first Corvettes were behind the axle mounts. My Alpine and MGs, Healeys you name it are all mounted behind the axle or best way to look at it is the suspension is mounted infront of the engine. Only grey area might be the affordable transverse mounts where the engine was barely infront of the rear axle, like the X1/9, Scorpion, MR2, Fiero but they still are not rear engined either so they get mid engine status.
January 15, 200620 yr Author its all about this bad ass i think it spanks on the cien in almost every way ( not to be dissin gm) You, sir, have no taste. Anyways, I don't think this has been posted yet...
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.