Big guys in little cars is just WRONG! in my book. I will never understand it.

I agree with you... except if you're parking in NYC (or another VERY tight metro), the dumb Smart seats a big guy better than a Cruze or Malibu and parks anywhere at a fraction of the hassle... and suddenly makes sense.

I can understand it in that situation, and even though I like small cars, the A segment cars like Scion IQ, Smart, Fiat 500 are too small in my book.

Big guys in little cars is just WRONG! in my book. I will never understand it.

I agree with you... except if you're parking in NYC (or another VERY tight metro), the dumb Smart seats a big guy better than a Cruze or Malibu and parks anywhere at a fraction of the hassle... and suddenly makes sense.

I can understand it in that situation, and even though I like small cars, the A segment cars like Scion IQ, Smart, Fiat 500 are too small in my book.

+1 they are all too small in my book too!

Big guys in little cars is just WRONG! in my book. I will never understand it.

Yes - I agree 100%!! Here's another one to prove this point:

That is just comical on so many levels.

Like Buikc was trying to say, "Hey, look, even Shaq fits in our car!"

hahaha, no he doesn't.

Does Shaq fit in any modern car?

I am sure he would fit in a CTS or XTS far better than that Buick.

Course non of us Shreks really fit into any car, just keep us in our Full Size SUV's.

XTS wouldn't be any better..it's just as tiny as the LaCrosse...short wheelbase, narrow.

XTS has 4" MORE front legroom than an s-class. It has 5" LESS hip room than the s-, but this dimension depends entirely on console width, which this stat never states. However, XTS certainly isn't, overall, "tiny" inside.