Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Cheers & Gears

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

FLY or NO FLY

What do you think about the "Plane on a Treadmill" question? 30 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think about the "Plane on a Treadmill" question?

    • The plane will not FLY
      43%
      13
    • The plane will FLY
      40%
      12
    • Undecided... confused
      3%
      1
    • Undecided, can see both sides
      13%
      4

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

Most of you should know what this is all about. :)

Just curious as to what the breakdown is at this point.

http://www.cheersandgears.com/forums/index...?showtopic=9817

I thought you guys were kicking me out or something.

Anyway, the plane won't fly. There's no 'both sides' to it. Sorry.

well if the tredmill is based on the wheel speed, then it wont take off... if the tredmill is based on the plane speed, it will take off...

  • Author

Anyway, the plane won't fly. There's no 'both sides' to it. Sorry.

Look out for the Seven Horsemen... me and Fly agree 100%. :wink:

well if the tredmill is based on the wheel speed, then it wont take off... if the tredmill is based on the plane speed, it will take off...

what he said

There are too many unknowns to know the answer. If a treadmill is moving 100,000 mph in the opposite direction of the plane, it could possibly create a strong enough headwind to lift the plane, but that still would depend on other factors such as the surface area of the treadmill.

Or maybe the wheels create more friction, and it would only take 1000mph to counter the force of the engines thrust.

Too many factors to know the answer.

Um, guys...Fly's a pilot. If he says it won't fly, it won't fly :)

  • Author

I knew Fly was an aviation buff but is he a pilot too?

Hmmm... either way I sent you a PM a few min ago. (Fly)

It will Fly.

I, too, thought this was about Flybri'

Plane speed and wheel speed do not differ.

but they do!

lets go a different example...

you are standing on top of a log in a rapid river...

and you are running on top of the log,

lets say the rivers current is 10 mph <-----, and you are jumping and running on that log, and its spinning, your running 20 mph ---->

the logs speed is irrelivent, because its spinning freely... but its not 20 mph, and its not 10 mph... i know that

so the faster the tredmill goes, the faster the wheels go...

and as long as the plane is making progress down the tredmil (which it will as long as the tredmil is going slow) the wheels speed will continually be doubling, or going up expedentially... regaurdless of the planes speed...

Um, guys...Fly's a pilot. If he says it won't fly, it won't fly :)

ummm... he didnt design the plane i'm assuming...

Plane speed and wheel speed do not differ.

depends on if your talking about plane speed relative to the ground or plane speed relative to treadmill. I believe he was talking about plane speed relative to the ground. Example - Wheel speed 50mph, treadmill from hell 50mph, plane speed 0mph (relative to the ground)

well if the tredmill is based on the wheel speed, then it wont take off... if the tredmill is based on the plane speed, it will take off...

:withstupid:

I say we submit this to Mythbusters and let them sort it out in some crazed maniacal way.

So now we've got two threads going on regarding this topic...

In case you didn't see my post in the other thread, I still think this entire conversation is nuts.

This debate has been argued by ENGINEERS, AVIATORS, and PHYSICISTS! Do you think this thread will settle the score?

I say we submit this to Mythbusters and let them sort it out in some crazed maniacal way.

Thats the best idea I have heard all day

As the question was phrased in the other thread: the plane cannot fly. No wind, no lift, no exceptions.

Who said there's no wind?

Edited by NOS2006

Who said there's no wind?

OK, so wind isn't the right term. No flow of air around the airfoil (wing), no lift, no flight, no exceptions.

My more important questions are how bad the engines were overtemped and do I have to borescope or just change them, what happened to the wheel speed sensors and the brake temp sensors as the landing gear heated up (do I have to fix those systems too?), and can I call in sick rather than fix this thing after it broke?

Well, this would be a tough decision after all the crap he's pulled in the past, but I will mercifully allow Fly to stay...even though he can be a real son of a---

***gets pulled aside, assistant whispers something in his ear.***

Oh...the plane on a converyor belt...right...sorry...

strike everything I just said

Anyway, no. There's no way that the plane could fly because the only way that a plane can fly is the speed of the airflow over the wing compared to the speed of the airflow under the wing. If the conveyor is moving at exactly the same speed in the opposite direction as the plane is trying to go, then the plane is just going to stay in one spot, because the variable that allows it to fly is not present.

Not to mention that it would be a horrible waste of jet fuel...

Arrrgh, you mean I have to fuel it up too? :lol:

well yeah, otherwise it definetly wouldn't fly. The converor would sling it backwards, causing a spoiler effect that would create so much downforce, it'll either rip the wings off or run the plane into the ground.

Edited by Turbojett

well yeah, otherwise it definetly wouldn't fly. The converor would sling it backwards, causing a spoiler effect that would create so much downforce, it'll either rip the wings off or run the plane into the ground.

Actually according to the problem, the conveyer won't move if the aircraft doesn't so that means it can just sit there. I am perfectly OK with that. :P

Ok, well, then it's definetly not going anywhere then. :thumbsup:

Edited by Turbojett

  • Author

Seriously, Mythbusters needs to settle this one, although

there is no doubt in my mind the plane is not taking off.

Seriously, Mythbusters needs to settle this one, although

there is no doubt in my mind the plane is not taking off.

Knowing those guys the plane will wind up in the air somehow though... :P

Knowing those guys the plane will wind up in the air somehow though... :P

What's the difference? It will anyway. :P
  • Author

10: NO FLY

4: FLY

Seems like NOS is in the Minority.

Woot, woot, woot-woot! :P

-------------

~ Silvester AKA Chapman

Posted Image

1983 Plymouth Champ: FWD, clamshell hood, 4-banger & 8-speed

passanger seat: XP715, driver's seat: SpeedingPenguin

Edited by Sixty8panther

The minority won: read the original thread. :AH-HA_wink:

the more interesting question is how fast will the treadmill have to go to keep the plane stationary.

I think that would just depend on how much grease is on the wheel bearings.
  • Author

The minority won: read the original thread. :AH-HA_wink:

Keep telling yourself that. :stupid::P :wink:

Fly... No doubt in my mind. I'm related to Einstein. :P

I thought i wasnt going to comment on this but now i have actually thought about it and now listening to some people my ears are bleeding.

The plane will not fly How ever if we put it into a Wind tunnel it will.

if convyer goes <--- this way and plane ---> and the jets are on the plane will take off under own thrust and fly away.

If convyer goes<-- this way and plane is facing--> this way with no thrust the plane goes <--that way no flying happening

If convyer goes --> that way and plane facing --->that way the plane lets say Cessna 170 If i remeber achives Flight a 63 knots of airspeed under the wings. So if the Convyer can drag the plane to reache the 63 knots of airspeed the plane will shortly fly then lose airspeed and stall crash on to Convyer and the FAA has to file the most strangest accident report in history.

If I acomplished anything but confusion i will be happy. There need to be movement of Air under the wings to cause the change in pressures to create lift to make the plane fly. Airspeed is the Key factor in this problem. The Convyer speed and wheel speed have nothing to do to make the plane fly.

the plane will shortly fly then lose airspeed and stall crash on to Convyer and the FAA has to file the most strangest accident report in history.

If I acomplished anything but confusion i will be happy.

:lol::lol:

heres a diagram since we all need pictures.

Posted Image

there needs to be air flowing under the wings. +

and the airflow over the top of the wings needs to be going faster than the airflow underneath, since the topside of the wing arcs up in front.

Thanks forgot that Turbojett

Edited by capriceman

and the airflow over the top of the wings needs to be going faster than the airflow underneath, since the topside of the wing arcs up in front.

not until now, it wasn't. zip yours up btw. you leave the barn door open, the horses wander off.

WTH is a "math mathematician"? :unsure:
  • Author

Sss sttt Stud-er maybe? :P

(I'm gong to Hell)

I've finally decided that I can see it either way.

Assuming that the treadmill succeeds in counteracting the movement of the aircraft, making a net speed of 0 mph, the plane cannot take off.

However, if the aircraft can continue to move forward despite the opposing force of the treadmill, then yes, the plane will eventually take off.

I suppose by my own standards that this officially makes me crazy. :lol:

I think what Mythbusters would probably do is strap a small rocket and a pair of wings to a rollerskate and watch it launch into wall across the testing facility.

I'd bet if they did get their hands on this, they wouldn't be able to prove it either way. This is 100% hypothetical. The technology required to get the treadmill to speed match the aircraft on top of it would probably be too expensive. Unless NordicTrack has something we can use... :scratchchin:

Edited by aaaantoine

I'm somehow related to Einstein... I think that makes me right. :D

I'm somehow related to Einstein... I think that makes me right. :D

lol yea right... that would make you a jew... jews are always wrong :pokeowned:

i'm just playing

lol yea right... that would make you a jew... jews are always wrong  :pokeowned:

i'm just playing

Jews are stereotypically rich; BV isn't rich. Therefore, BV isn't related to Einstein. :P
Perhaps our Vipes got the words "relative" and "relativity" mixed up? :unsure:

What? No... We're 9th cousins, three times removed. :P

I'd bet if they did get their hands on this, they wouldn't be able to prove it either way.  This is 100% hypothetical.  The technology required to get the treadmill to speed match the aircraft on top of it would probably be too expensive.  Unless NordicTrack has something we can use... :scratchchin:

that's where a treadmill and a small model airplane comes into play.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.