FordCosworth

Hence me quoting your replies to me. Shows all where and at who you called a troll. Thanks for getting played like a flute.

" No I was talking about Nissan. No wait, I was talking about Nissan and Toyota.."Yes, your changing of story while throwing in a name call jab is an epic fail. So you're a mind reader now and you knew exactly what he was talking about when he said it, even though there are five players in the full size game, and three of those are all on older bones? Man, that's impressive. Bravo! Nice of you to chime in. Wouldn't be complete without you sticking your nose in. Thanks for the input.

Conversing with me. Throws out a few name calls while conversing with...wait for it...me. And now says " YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHO I WAS REFERRING TO. " HA!

" No I was talking about Nissan. No wait, I was talking about Nissan and Toyota.."Yes, your changing of story while throwing in a name call jab is an epic fail.

Then why speak plural ( fossilized platforms ) if talking about Nissan?Why you save quote, man? All you're doing is saving proof that you were putting words into my mouth. That's trolling, no ifs, ands, or buts.Also, Toyota platform? Kinda ancient too, wot? Yeesh Save quote because it's proof of what was said and cannot be edited to show words were not put in your mouth. Do like how your story changes now to now include Toyota. Yeesh

Then why speak plural ( fossilized platforms ) if talking about Nissan?

It's well know that fossilized platform, which beat a brand new offering ( see C&D comparo ) is being replaced soon - before this might be Ram SUV would make its debut. And an like its Yukon/Suburban competition, that fossilized SUV is not on a Least Reliable List either.

Next truck isn't due for years. Word is 2021.

Sales are not the topic of discussion here though (as you like to point out in other threads). Thanks for down vote on the facts again (and this time no one can use perceived condescension as an excuse). Nice to know that some save those one a day votes for just such an occasion. Votes aren't the topic of discussion here ( as you like to point out, in this thread ).

As GM fans love to say.... Sales!!! Look at them sales!!!

When a recall occurs, it will be associated with the vehicle identification numbers (VINs) of all affected registered vehicles.

Since there's been over 1300 fires since last recall, one can say GM is not being proactive at all.It's not different than the almost twenty years of Ford cruise control issues, some issued more than four times for certain models. GM is going beyond the need considering a big chunk of these models are almost 20 years old. http://www.lieffcabraser.com/Personal-Injury/Car-Accidents/Ford-Cruise-Control-Switch-Fires.shtmlhttp://www.autosafety.org/ford-cruise-control-deactivation-switch-recalls-and-history Wrong thread. This has NOTHING to do with Ford. Correct thread because it was made to illustrate the relative nature of the term "pro active" and how competing companies handle repeat issues. Wrong thread. This is a GM Recall. Nothing to do with Ford.

Since there's been over 1300 fires since last recall, one can say GM is not being proactive at all. It's not different than the almost twenty years of Ford cruise control issues, some issued more than four times for certain models. GM is going beyond the need considering a big chunk of these models are almost 20 years old. http://www.lieffcabraser.com/Personal-Injury/Car-Accidents/Ford-Cruise-Control-Switch-Fires.shtml http://www.autosafety.org/ford-cruise-control-deactivation-switch-recalls-and-history Wrong thread. This has NOTHING to do with Ford.

Since there's been over 1300 fires since last recall, one can say GM is not being proactive at all.

There is just so much power these days. I mean, I had a blast with my early 90's Mustang GT with about 225 hp. Ruined my drivers record for a while too, lol. But yeah, the Shelby packs a lot of performance for the $$. I am so glad that Ford offers performance gradients for the customer to choose, as in the R model. Few people want or need that extra little track advantage, if they have to suffer the whole time they own it. Especially considering most never even visit a track. So making it standard, makes little sense. Yes. Ford seems to be doing it right ( financial wise too ). One who wants a still damn buttoned down, but comfortable Shelby, can be entertained by the GT350 and all its creature comforts. You can always option up the Track Pak for even more excitement. For those that desire more, up a higher notch is still the R.

I'm wondering what the cheapest 500+ HP car list looks like? I'm betting the GT350 tops that list as least expensive car with 500+ HP

Huh...

Not bad at all!

Never has a user name been more appropriate

" They say there's nothing more American than grabbing a hot dog, heading to the ballpark, and watching nine guys from the Dominican Republic. " - W. Ferrell

And F-Series - winning! 70k in Sept too.

I read somewhere today there have already been 1500 preorders in the UK for it. http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2015/10/ford-focus-rs-orders-reach-1-500-mark-in-the-uk.html Wow. 1500 pre orders. Nice.

Since the Focus ST did better than Ford anticipated, I'm interested in how the Focus RS is gong to sell. The more I read about that car, the more I'm thinking Hmmmmm, maybe my next ride.

On the PREVIOUS PAGE. "Fact is while the big bump in Mustang sales is a boon for Ford, it is not surprising when you consider, A.) It is a brand new model after ten years of the basically the same car. B.) It's biggest competition, the Camaro, is on the way out with capacity cut months ago (hence their lower sales numbers). It's the same thing the Mustang went through at this time last year (under 4,000 sold in 9/14 I believe). C.) Once the new Camaro is out, then we see more competitive numbers come into play. The last six months mean very little in the grand scheme of things." Like I said, a day late and a dollar short. I anxiously await your apology for being ignorant to this fact. Edit (after the down vote)--Nice. I give you the facts after you accused me of not doing so and then you down vote that very fact. Pathetic LS7. I apologize. 1 out of your 10 or so posts you actually did discuss the thread topic - after you were asked to get on topic.