Jump to content

griswold44

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. griswold44 replied to regfootball's post in a topic in Toyota
    For cars they don't get enough results on, they don't give out any data for.
  2. griswold44 replied to regfootball's post in a topic in Toyota
    That doesn't necessarily prove anything, considering the owners of those vehicles could've been posting their negative experience on the vehicle. These types of results are too small to really get a good idea on how a vehicle performs, and how do we know they aren't making it up? You can register on their & say anything you want.
  3. Toyota won't necessarily go down the tube like GM did. First, GM has pretty much shown everyone what NOT to do when you're #1. Second, Toyota has already acknowledged what kills large companies, and they are already taking measures to prevent it. And third, GM's quality didn't fall because of their size, it fell because they just didn't care about what they built. If GM can improve their quality while still being large, then there is no reason why Toyota can't maintain theirs.
  4. ricers-shaft-big3, is that you?
  5. griswold44 replied to CSpec's post in a topic in 2005 Sales Archive
    Because it gives customers a smooth, quiet ride, high resale value, and most of all; reliability.
  6. Quality has gotten better, but there is always room for more improvement. Their main problem is PRODUCT. Stop giving the public rehashed platforms with 4 speed autos, 3800s, and technology that dates back to 1982. <_<
  7. griswold44 replied to KaliRover's post in a topic in Toyota
    Toyota needs to bring back the Celica, Supra, and possibly the MR2. They were all great cars back in their day, and there IS a market for them. A Supra with the 3GR V6 would be great.