Jump to content

jmsjags

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. is anyone actually going to pay for this? OnStar is already outdated by competitor systems such as Sync, Blue&Me, Blue Link, and UVO. i guess if you have an older vehicle it's your only choice, but $19 a month of top of the $400 cost for purchase and install seems kinda steep to me!
  2. that thing's UGLY. the grill looks terrible and doesn't mesh with the rest of the car at all. and the back end has too much emptiness which makes it look bloated. the current design actually stands out in the crowd while this thing looks like every other generic SUV out there. overall a step backwards IMO
  3. why do chrysler's interiors have to be sooo bland?? every single one looks like it's been designed by a fourth grader using only a straight-edge. everywhere u look there's boxes, squares, and sometimes even rectangles! i've never taken a day of design class in my life and i could do better than that. and then they think by using leather seats and sticking an analog clock in the center stack that they can call it luxury and charge a premium over a similar dodge vehicle. lame
  4. jmsjags replied to Chevy Nick's post in a topic in Powertrain
    pretty cool. i'm really interested to see an ls2 vs ls3 though. they have similar stats on paper but according to the vette guys in the real world there's a great deal of difference
  5. your camaro is dependable?? i changed the window motors in my '97 3 times in the year that i owned it. not to mention the driver's side door was starting to sag. i also had to replace the dashboard because it was cracking so bad it almost split in half. that's some awesome build quality right there
  6. why is it so hard for GM to make an affordable rwd coupe that doesn't weight 4000 lbs? TOYOTA is coming out with one in 2011 for god sake! GM needs to get its head out its ass and produce what people want for a change
  7. so why didn't hyundai stick the v8 in the genesis coupe? i love the looks and the price but the v6 is still too underpowered for my tastes
  8. am i the only one that likes it!? i think it looks AMAZING. and how ANYTHING can look worse than the bland ass equinox beats me... i don't think they could've styled it any better. all the guys who's wives are forcing them to trade in their trucks for a family suv will probably be buying this. good work gm!
  9. jmsjags replied to Blake Noble's post in a topic in Subaru
    an affordable rear-wheel drive sedan...finally someone GETS IT!! this just may be my first new car! i would love to support the home team but how long has it been now that GM has been promising us a rear-wheel drive alpha? keep producing your boring ass cars GM, i'll just go elsewhere
  10. The wagon got cancelled because there is no market for it in the U.S. Wagons are all but extinct here, and I can see why.
  11. Wow I never knew Suzuki had so many sales here. I thought they were pretty much a dead brand. But anyway, what's up with every manufacturer nowadays making the rear windows slope upwards? It makes the car look top heavy. It would look so much better with just a flat rear window!
  12. Waaaay outta my price range, but that looks GOOD!
  13. They could've at least made it look sporty. That looks like a blob on wheels.
  14. jmsjags replied to bostonspider's post in a topic in Cadillac
    That side panel looks
  15. Why doesn't the Pontiac website show pricing?