Enzora

Giant bubbling lake farts. http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalch...ller_lakes.html Human beings come a close second.

It's actually pretty natural for little children to masturbate unless someone teaches them not to.

Yes, but like many political myths, Dubya has done a pretty good job of debunking the notion that working in Washington somehow makes you more corrupt than being a politician in other venues.

Funny you mention that. I talked to my girlfriend afterwards, and she actually did listen to it over the radio, because her family had to drive to Kentucky for a funeral, and she said she thought McCain performed better in the debate, so I think that may have been the case. Unfortunately for him, the percentage of people using radio to hear the speech vs TV is nowhere near what it was in 1960. Obama's always going to have the edge in presentation just because he's so much younger and better looking, but McCain's body language was flat-out awful. It looked like he had actually been coached in Bushian debating style, only to have it backfire horribly. I wouldn't be surprised to see him take a new approach in the next two debates.

Well, it's certainly the best looking compact box on wheels I've seen. But a Stingray?

Content-wise, I think both did well, although both had a chance to take bigger hits on each other that they didn't finish. I also thought McCain stuck too much to talking points instead of explaining himself more, even when he made a good point. But I do hope that America won't fall into the trap that "either is an improvement" because that really means nothing given our current president. Presentation-wise, well duh, it was a redux of Nixon vs Kennedy, 1960.

:pours out a bottle of salad dressing: RIP, Paul. I hate when people look to celebrities as role models, but he was one of the few who was.

Knowing that makes it much funnier to watch him play "himself" in the Harold and Kumar movies.

Don't get too excited. I wouldn't trust the guy who allowed Millen to stay for so long and draft 37 wide receivers in the first round to make a smart selection for his replacement.

Oops! I meant I used to have Verizon. I switched to Cingular just before it merged into AT&T.

AT&T with a Samsung SGH-A707. I did have Cingular, haven't really noticed any real difference in reception since I switched, so whatever. But my phone is red and shiny, so that's a plus. . . . Yeah, I'm not much of a tech geek.

Yes, and internet polls are hardly scientific. It's pretty obvious that there's been some poll-skewing afoot.

What is that, a libertarian website?

The big difference here is that the Altezza and several other cars actually look good with clear tail lights. Not even the ZR1 can avoid looking like a prickmobile with a hood window.

Well, I know that the current presidency doesn't hold much stock in the Constitution, but there are a few pesky sections that keep hindering them. The 22nd Amendment, for example:

Nah. If Obama is elected, Cheney will have Bush assassinated, take over, and declare himself president for life.

Odyssey

Alice

Boss 302

Re: Abortion. I'm very ambivalent on the issue, because I think both sides have a very good point, and I also think that neither side really listens to the other. I was raised Catholic, so I grew up indoctrinated in the right to life philosophy, which I still largely agree with. And what people who try to use slogans like "my body, my choice" don't seem to acknowledge is that if you view the uterus as a living person, then that argument becomes completely irrelevant once the egg is fertilized. That's the one side. I get it. But despite this, I can't align myself with that viewpoint. One, I think the main impulse for the pro-life stance is religious (though not for everyone, admittedly.) But more importantly, I realized that the behavior of those politicians who push a "pro-life agenda" isn't consistent with the actions of someone who is working to prevent abortion, but is instead consistent with those who wish to deny women control over their own sexuality and push for a regressive view of sexuality in general. The Sarah Palins of the world, who are against abortion, but are also against teaching teenagers about basic contraception, even though it's been proven to be a horrible strategy. We hold the woman accountable, but men are too easily allowed to get off without responsibility, and our society isn't exactly that supportive of single women who do get pregnant. Funny thing is, the proponents of neither side like abortion. In fact, both sides seem to be hoping for a world where abortion doesn't exist. And given the choice between the two, I'd rather live in the pro-choice "ideal world without abortion" where it's been made irrelevant due to improvements in contraception and education as well as a more enlightened view of sexuality in general.

Tammy Faye Bakker

Blu's not Dorothy; just a friend. Ba Dum Cha

mystique

You could cut the sexual tension in this thread with a knife.