bowtie_dude

^^^ Thats mind blowing.

I think I can agree on that. With the spy shots of teh CTS interior, the new SRX interior, and now this, I think GM may finally have a handle on things.

Looks a lot better as far as design and center stack integration are concerned. The Aura's stereo and HVAC controls are just kind of floating in space while this flows very well with the rest of the dash. And yeah, the G6 interior is officially ass-tastic.

Detnews has an article with the same, albeit smaller and lower res, picture, so it must be OK.

Who gives a $h!? Look at it while we can and ooh and aah and take solace in the fact that GM finally seems to be doing what it NEEDS to be and raising the bar instead of meeting it.

Ho-ho-HOLY $h!, thats nice! Thats 10 times f@#king better than the Camry's interior. Though GM had better offer nav in the damn thing.

This is just like any other year-end clearance every other manufacturer does.

I love the front bumper treatment.

I've seen that somewhere before... ...Oh yeah!

Holy Moses, that grill is ugly as hell! Typically fantastic Acura interior, though.

Rancor.

Cheaper goods, off the top of my head.

I would also like to see a small RWD car with sedan and coupe variants priced in the Cobalt range.

The notion that the Colorado/Canyon are competitive vehicles.

^^^ That would also be very nice.

Obviously everyone is looking forward to what we KNOW is coming. The 08 CTS, 08 Malibu, production Enclave, etc. But I'm talking about surprises. Honestly, I'd love to see, at least in concept form, a RWD sedan for Pontiac. Nothing would tickle me more than the hope that GM will give me a BMW 3-series-sized-Pontiac-priced RWD sedan.

I just can't believe that red dash lights was a mark against the Mazda 3. Its an aesthetic preference you douchebag, pretentious A-holes. Why is blue so much better? GOD, that kind of crap is why I hate C&D. BMWs have red dash lighting, yet they LOVE their 3-series. Ugh!!!

Pretty f@#king hard in the Kentucky Bluegrass area. 7 Chevrolet dealers within 25 miles, and, aside from SS Supercharged, about 3 manuals (and they're base level models) among them.

Its a simple matter of price. The 4.3L is bought and paid for, has been for a long time, so GM makes almost all profit off of it while being able to charge a low price for the stripper W/T models. There's no NEED for the I-6 is the base engine because a V8 can make the same power for the same price.

Shew, thats an ugly truck. Looks like a giant tadpole. I hope its ready to get thoroughly trounced by the 900s.

I'd love to have a Sierra Reg cab, short box 2WD with a 5.3L.

Thats sexy as hell. Check out the gauges...pretty...

Budding markets like China and Russia should keep GM on top globally.

I'd like to see 255hp 3.6L standard the 300+hp direct-injected 3.6L as the upgrade.

(1) Ford and Chrysler are definitely NOT at the forefront of powertrain technology, so their engines are a moot point. Bottom line, in anything less than 8 cylinders, pushrod's just don't cut it. Not on power or refinement. (2) I actually agree on that, its a matter of preference and what you're use to. (3) Because the competition does it. GM needs to be better than the competition, and material quality, even in rarely touched areas, is one of the things that Toyota and Honda continue to best GM in. (4) 5-spds have increased fuel economy over 4-spds. The Tundra got a 2-3 MPG increase when Toyota put the 5-spd in it. (5) Same as 2, personal preference. I actually prefer 4-spoke because when I drive I like to hold onto the bottom left spoke.