Chris_Doane

I didn't say that, no.

500+ hp. Blown.

Never go against the family...

Or wrong as it were.

Hah OK, guess I'll just cut and paste my post from z28.com:

Oh geez DON'T put that thought it people's heads. Foreign market stuff tests here all the time. It's nothing, I promise.

"Drunk Man Parks Horse in German Bank" http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/H/HOR...-04-24-23-02-45 The photo with the story is priceless.

http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightline/2675

Thanks fellas.

Internally it's being referred to as "H3T."

http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2009/humme...pied/page1.html http://rockcrawler.com/features/newsshorts...mer_h3t_spy.asp http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightline/2670

Official, but, from a while ago. I assume it hasn't changed since then as I haven't heard otherwise.

I dont know. Like Northie said, probably mostly cost. The LS7 is assembled by hand at the Performance Build Center in Wixom. The "LSA" motor for the CTSv will be built in a regular engine plant.

No I get your point fine. You started out talked about performance with no mention of cost. You were wrong (unless of course we are still comparing an old car to a current one) now the topic has changed to price.

It's a blown LS motor.

Eh, don't much care what happens to that photo....doesn't have any personal/monetary value to me.

I didn't get video when I heard/saw it, no. They drove it for 2 seconds and then put the cover back on.

Wait till you actually hear the motor. It's pure evil.

Yea I've heard everyone in Auburn Hills is on edge. He was driving the JC49 CUV.

Hah you know I was just joking with someone how I could put together a gallery of Chrysler engineers giving the finger.

I believe he was indicating to me about how many chances Chrysler has left to get an interior right.

You are talking about a Zonda, the C12S, that is six/seven years old. Started production in 2000. I'm talking about the Zonda F. The one that started production in 2005. The current Z06 started production in 2005. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Laps

LoL! Um, no.

No, I know what you mean...your first post just came off as kind of insensitive and with horribly skewed priorities. However, this tragedy isn't nearly in the same league as Anna Nicole fluff. As horrible as the whole thing is, it IS very significant news. Terrible, awful, but significant, news. It warrants significant, continued coverage as the story becomes more clear. That said, in the coming week and weeks, the coverage could very well start to go overboard. You are right about rumors sometimes being given too much weight. Especially in breaking news situations. Honestly I don't think ANYONE is "happy" about this. Even the most cynical news exec isn't happy about 32 dead kids and teachers. Most people in the news business were getting ready to cover the Alberto Gonzalez hearings anyway.

I know you said you didn't mean to make light of the situation....but....seriously. So far 32 innocent people are dead. Who gives a f@#k about Don Imus at this point?