Sixty8panther

:lol: x 1,000,000,000 So let me get this straight. BOF design sucks for a luxury car that is designed for comfort and is a poor choice for a durrable car like a cop car, taxi or ruggerd family sedan BUT ....it's okay for a "sports car"?! Oh my Freeking God I'm laughing so hard I can't even see straight. AS far as throwing in a Aston Martin, Corvette, Viper & GT40 Balthazar already took care of that discrepancy but just for shit's and giggles here's a few cars for comparison: Aston Martin: Corvette:

I guess all the other times I drove high milage BMWs and they seemed just about on par wiht ym high milage Caddy GM must have doctored those cars too right? :rolleyes: For the record I love the styling of both the 545 & STS, and the E-class is just bland on the exterior. More 1995 than 2005. As far as the quality it's on par wiht the cars' prices. The Germans have an edge over the Japanese but not much, as far as Cadillac goes Dollar for dollar GM makes a great luxury car.

Nope that complaint only comes up if I post a girl in a bikini. :rolleyes: <_<

> getting back to the cars < Sort of retarded but I'll give them an A for effort. I'd still rather see something like this on the road than a Civic wiht a fartcan.

Your friend eats "Maxican Feet"? :huh: All joking aside crazy broads like that suck.

Yummy. Love that sleek hourglass figure and provocative poses. :D

You know that I'm with you on that. As is Knightfan, LordStafford & many others. :)

OcnBlu: have you seen that crazy "Napoleon Dynamite" flick? There's a kiler Grand Ville ragtop lowrider in it with red sparkle paint. :wub: Sorry, couldn't find a 4dr '73 Cat.

The greenhouse was decent as was the charactder line down thta side, even though it reminded too much of the Corsica but the fascia, tail lights and profile were bland as whilte Wonderbread toast.

yup.... a classic car from the 50s/60s jumps out at you. Bold and dynamic, a modern car (95% off the time) blends in like a pebble in a cobblestone street.

2000-2005 Ocnblu: Absolutely. How about a true 4dr hardtop STS or 300C? :)

Which era would you rather live in as an Automotive enthusiast? 1955-1960

I agre with you 100% here Balthazar. One quick addition. Super 8: Idea on paper: A+ (c'mon a hardtop with suicide doors :wub:) Excecution: D- ugly and cheap looking like a Plastic toy.

Wow another thread gone bad. Chirping tires in FWD is just lame and was obviously not waht I was talking about. Lbs. per Lbs. the Camry versus Impala decision is a no brainer unless you eat that crap CR keeps shoveling down subscriber's throats.

Awsome. I'll never pay $189 for a 1:18 scale model though. The most I've ever payed was $85 for GMPs 1987 Buick GNX. I had to have the real black one not the stupid white or silver ones they re-released. I also payed $50 for my '69 Yenko Super Camaro. MOst of my 1:18 scales were purchased for under $25. Bburago, Maisto & Ertl/AMT.

That's not saying much. The '95 Monte is a low point in styling.

Google. :)

Nice. My buddy Ross has a white diamond '95 Riviera with the factory chrome rims (super rare). Just the other day on our way to buy a demolition derby car we got on Rt.95 and he got it up to 90mph and the car felt like it was doing 65. Just as solid as the STS.

Have you driven one? I drove the v6 and Northstar at a R&T/C&D ride and drive event and the E500 felt like a overweight pig compared to the Northstar Caddy while the 530i had about a 1.25 second delay in throttle response. I wish I had the chance to drive the new BMW 545i but I have not.

Okay, I was joking but anyway... I mean the dimensions of that pic are 594 x 894. It was meant to be absurdly big.

No it's not a minivan. It's more of a ummm.... like, uhhh... Mini-crossover-tall-roof-wagon thingy... :P

Better yet drive your newly bought Fiero down a dirt road at 75mph at 2:00am with no lights on and you might get lucky and test out the safety of that space frame. :ph34r:

How the fuck do you call the SSR a "pillarles hardtop" when it only has four pieces of glass. Shows how well you guys understand the term pillarles hardtop! :rolleyes: BTW: only a real fu%$ing idiot would call the SSR a "car". Other than that I'm not even going to TRY to justify my comments except to say a BMW M3 or Caddy CTS will make that same Acura look like a Citation around a racetrack. So why try to make a Caamro versus Acura comparison? Retards at GM once tried to make a FWD F-body once, thank god they didn't have you guys to give them a pat on the back as they made the Camaro and Firebird off the same platform as the Corsica & Berett. In the mean time (since I'm done wiht this thread) ask a true Automotive Fanatic the true definition of the word "Hardtop". If he mentions the Mercedes SLK or a Chevy SSR the the guy is a fraud.

It's not about being close minded there BV, I DO NOT LIKE 95% of FWD cars. And I sure as $hit will never make PAYEMNTS on one. Why TF should I compromise my standards? To make you and other Grand Am/Malibu/Civic/Altima driving semi-enhusiasts happy? I never said ALL three cars (M/C Chevelle & Camaro) should be sold simultaneously but the lask of the later tow and the lackl of the first wiht RWD/manual trans. pisses me off. What the hell woulf the Ford lineup look like without the Crown Vis and Mustang? If they made two otehr bland looking FWD cars to replace those two do you think that Ford enthusiasts would be happy? <_< I've said multiple times how I'd love to see a new ME Fiero but I'm just comparing apples to apples in terms of your making fun of my analogy. I like how you set up a whole website about how people should BUY you a Fiero, or donate money soo you can buy one etc... you're calling me a "whining fucking baby"? That's pretty amusing. As far as Croc, well there's a reason why you're not a moderator anymore.

WTF?! :huh: I never realised all those Japanese/German econoboxes used Premium. In my 10.5:1 compression Camaro I can understand, in my Cadillac STS's Northstar it's forgivable and it makes perfect sense in the Z06, but in a Jetta or Corolla?