CMG

LOL ACTUALLY... I'm not really "arguing" at all. Maybe RE-READ what I posted. A- the criticisms you posted were wishy-washy criticisms. They were basically summed up by a "could be better" consensus. B- I think the thread is about the INTERIOR, and the criticisms you posted weren't necessarily INTERIOR design criticisms. You were stretching. AGAIN. :AH-HA_wink:

Do me a favor and next time you have a chance check your battery voltage again, with the same meter you used when it read 12.3 volts...

I would check for spark, the fuel delivery can be bypassed by tricling a little fresh fuel down the carb while cranking... Suck Squish Bang Blow! If it's got compression- check for gas and ignition!

It looked like this- two little side scallops on the hood on each side of the scoop....

I actually saw a 2008 Caliber SRT4 today, and was reasonably impressed. I think it falls into the same category as the SRT4 based on the Neon for me, I don't "mind" the base vehicle, but the SRT4 package on either is almost a different car to me. It didn't seem outrageously expensive, just over the $25,000 mark, it was a heckuva "bang for the buck" deal for someone.... it was on a car lot but it was already sold. I wonder if it was an ordered car, it was the first one I have ever seen. The hood wasn't just a single scoop in the middle, I thought the single hood scoop was what they were getting? Cool little interior too!

That's some pretty wishy-washy criticism if you ask me...? Speaking of criticism, I followed today what I believe to have been a Sebring retractible hardtop convertible of some kind. Were they made? The top was up and it was NOT an attractive car from the rear IMO. Never seen one before, but it looked like a production car.

The one I saw had two tailpipes, it was a rental. (odd- it was at the airport too. LOL) I'm pretty sure it had an "LT" emblem on the back, I only saw the rear for a couple of seconds....

Who likes the big Caddies? ME!!!!!! I like Hearses too! LOL

I think he is talking about sex with OTHER people though reg.....? :AH-HA_wink:

Hahaha Perpetual inaccuracies IMO. Who is buying the Magnums? WE DID. We love it. Not hard to see out of, we don't have "poor poor visibilty at all. "Complete lack of practicality"...? Nope. It's practical, it hauls alot more than it looks like it could haul, we've done it many a time, building materials, TVs, you name it. I would say VERY practical, ours is a 5.7 Hemi, it's very good on gas considering the power available ( 5 speed and MDS) and it's extremely comfortable on long trips. Toss THIS in your little tiny Volvo... :AH-HA_wink:

I agree, I would rather have a rave in here than Springer. Good on ya.

Why oh why BV- every time I look at your sig I hear dance music.....

They were given away soooo cheap they were a "bang for the buck" deal I don't think will be seen for a looong time again. I hope a few of you are joking about the Camaro concept interior. It must be the worst part of any concept Chevy I have seen for over a decade.

Try this link and tell me what you all think. HONESTLY! http://www.carbodydesign.com/archive/2006/...rior%202-lg.jpg Better yet- here's a pic!

ALL the 2008 Challengers are SRT8 top of the line performance models, and they are under $40,000. It's funny how nobody flinches at over $40,000 for a projected pricetag for a top of the line performance Camaro...?? The new GTOs were being GIVEN away, I know people who have bought them at insanely low prices. The LS1 forum has a few unbelievable deal stories...

Bits and pieces posted on MoPar forums, I've read posts with guys who have actually sat in the production cars, not prototypes. Have YOU seen the interior on the Camaro concept? I would have to say it might scare people away from the car when it is produced, it's THAT bad IMO.

Well.... I finally saw one!!!!!! It was a rental, black, "LT" on the rear I am pretty sure and it had two tailpipes. It looked pretty good from the side, I like the profile.. it's bigger than what I was expecting, all this talk of Toyota/Honda comparing and I thought it would be smaller. I'm glad it isn't!

Take a look at the interior of the Challenger and the interior of the Camaro concept. Sorry, but once you see pictures posted of each interior I'll agree with an above poster- there is NO comparing the two cars. The interior of the Camaro concept is horrible IMO. I'm still willing to bet neither the Camaro or the Challenger base models will sell for a price as low as a base model Mustang.

If you think a fully optioned top of the line performance-wise Camaro is gonna sell for $30,000 or even close to that .... <insert "sell bridge" comments here> :AH-HA_wink:

Our local street races were FULL of Mustang 5.0 LXs when they came out late 80s, they were quick for a dead stock car back then...

It's obviously affecting your posts.....? Come back when the strike is over...? :AH-HA_wink:

Hahahahahaha You took the words right outta my mouth! *ahem* Honestly, what is with this forum? I think it's a pretty good product, I'll have to see what the base Challengers are like for the prictag they come with, but so far all things look pretty positive to me. The car looks good, very much like the original but still very much different. I hear a bigger engine is coming soon too, it will be interesting to see if that's rumor or fact. I want to see one in person!

Sounds like there will be TWO different Rams, a light duty and a heavy duty....?

Reminds me a littttle bit of the new Malibu, looks like they stole some styling cues....

Good! The fewer the imitation Miatas on the road the better as far as I am concerned.