Enzora

Why not? They've already followed Mercedes' misguided plan to weigh every car down with superfluous electronics.

The previews that I've seen have hinted that it's a love movie, but not that it's between two men. Now, my dad is intensely homophobic, but is into the whole cowboy thing (we have 4 horses) so based on the previews, it looks like a movie that he'd enjoy. Of course, he'd never watch it when he found out what it was about, but still, the thought of him watching it was a funny mental image to me.

I've had that problem. Just go to your control panel and switch your daylight savings time thing on or off as needed.

Considering how almost every new GM car seems to have headlights based on the '96 Civic, I'd say that comparison works both ways.

These are artists' renderings, dude. Toyota isn't trying anything with them. If anything, it's just hopeful fans trying too hard to inject styling where there is none.

No, you're definitely not alone. The 911 is near the top of my "to buy if I ever have the money" list.

Add that fishmouth grille to the odd proportions and the overall feel that the designers were trying too hard to be different, and yeah, it does look like a French design. Or a 4th-Gen Camaro.

Well, that's basically the case with the Lucerne, but that would be a great idea for future generations of RWD Buicks and Pontiacs.

Don't worry, I like Sinatra. I'm just not too fond of bandwagon arguments.

The top one looks French. The rest just look bad.

I've completed three semesters at UNC-Chapel Hill, working on a Sociology major.

Like Razor said, metal is heavily influenced by classical music. And great composition can sound good on any instrument.

Yes, they can, and often are.

Whoa! What happened to Teen Wolf?

Someone around UNC's campus has a '59 Coupe Deville. In the typical collegiate sea of Hondas and Volkswagens, that thing really knows how to stand out.

Overcome by the kindness of little ocnblu who, the Croc's heart grew three sizes that day!

Congratulations, Balthazar, you've solved the great riddle of the Chrysler 300. Now that we've solved that one, how about we take a few deep breaths and count backwards from ten? I'm personally sick of seeing crude, ham-fisted designs being described as "classic American cars." Look at those old cars from the 50s and 60s. Sure they were attention-getters, but they had better detail work than any other car in the world. Besides, judging by all the Bentley grille replacements I've seen, people aren't buying them because they look "American."

So is the difference because this is the big rig version, then?

Well, for starters, it is a '69 Mach 1. A simple check of the link could've shown that. But the stripes are also a giveaway. The Boss 429 didn't have any stripes, just a little "Boss 429" logo behind the front fender, and its hood scoop was much larger. This particular one has the Magnum 500s and rear deck spoiler from the Boss 302. Second, there was no Boss 429 SCJ. The Boss 429 was available from '69-'70 and the 429 SCJ was offered in '71. This one might be a 428 Cobra Jet, can't really tell from this pic. So, did I forget anything? Hmm, given my own dorky obsession over classic Mustangs, I really should be more forviging to Sixty8 and his neverending hardtop threads, shouldn't I? Anyway, how about we all step back and bask in the awe of how cool it is to have a Mustang photographed in front of a Mustang. In matching colors, no less.

I've heard that GM's had trouble making their hoods align with the rest of the car, but that's a bit ridiculous. Seriously though, what gives? At first I thought it was some weird vent setup, but the picture Harley posted shows it matching up.

Yes, I mean no . . . mo? MO! Edit: Maybe that should be CO?

Freaky, but it's not a Splash. And you know, despite the stupid name, the Dude was actually a pretty sharp looking truck. Well, at least the Sweptline was. Don't know how good it was mechanically, though.

Idunno, maybe it's just me, but 300N is just one of those terms that sounds really ugly when you say it out loud. There's too much noise coming from the back of the throat or something.

Innocence has never guaranteed that your rights won't be infringed upon.

Wow, I didn't know about that. Still, an irreversible decision like killing someone? It's just not something I'll ever be comfortable with. I agree, some people should never live freely again, but not by killing them.