91z4me

OMG It has the Smart Stalk!!!

So a 50K per year difference between them? That isn't a lot but it is still a difference. Lets home GM Arabia and GM China can pull up the GM NA slack.

Wanna try and do better? Put Solstice cues on a Commodore on the cheap. Best I could do with my skills.

You sure about that?

Yeah you guys west and south got your butts kicked. Chesterfield got a little ice but it is all gone since this morning's rain.

The one on the driver's side is actually the E-brake handle.

There is a girl in one of my wife's classes whose name is pronounced shi-TAD, long A. It is spelled $h!head. I have seen it on the roll form! Someone actually named their kid $h!head!!! What is the matter with these parents?

Yeah that was dirty but try finding a clean picture of a Cincinnati Bowtie!

OC I don't think you meant to have that dollar sign there, just a heads up. I will remove this once you fix it.

That wasn't the argument that was being presented. The argument was that the 5.7 Tundra topped the GMT900s completely, with an assumed emphasis on powertrain, so I showed that that wasn't true.OK so new argument your saying that the value of the 5.7 Tundra which will apparently be the volume engine is better than the GMT900s and your saying that the better gas mileage of the 5.7 makes it superior to the 6.2 Denali. Do I have the arguments you are presenting right? If so then I will reply in my next post.

While the truck may trump the GMT800s it doesn't top the 900s. While the 5.3 and 6.0 V8s are down on power (and paired to the 4 speed auto) the 6.2L V8 6 speed combo found in the GMC Sierra Denali is outpowering even the new Toyota 5.7. It has 403hp and around 401 ft/lbs of torque if I remember correctly. It isn't like GM couldn't up the production of the 6.2 and lower 5.3 or even 6.0 production to make the volume high enough to put the 6.2 in the Silverado as a lower volume engine to stay on tops in power. And lets not forget that there is a SC version of the Gen IV V8s coming in the not to distant future that will easily put whatever GM models it wishes to the top of the power range.

T is the truck code, hence GMT900, GMT355...The Astra is on an update T-body but it likely has its own GMX code as well.

Ignorance.

Spread the message to CZ28.com's Lounge and Future vehicle sections.

Hmmm...Looks like they had this thing traveling to/from the Georgetown plant and the Southern Indiana truck plant given its location, it is on I65 headed through Louisville, KY. Interesting to see them showing a picture of the Nav that is in Ford Country, Ford's SD trucks and Explorers are both made in Louisville.

Don't worry it happens to all of us. The medical name is "cargasm."

Finally a picture that I can use this for !

I thought there was talk last NAIAS of the BRX and 9-4 showing up at this years show. Maybe an Euro debut?

What about the SAAB 9-4? Is that not going to show up at NAIAS either?

USB plug is in the center console. It is an option. See the CTS press release thread for complete specs.

So far I dont likeit and that pisses me off. I liked the car so much based on the spy photos on the street but from these pics I am going to say it looks as off as the current DTS.

Yep. And as far as the Wii haters are concerned try posting on c&g w/ your ps3!!! Wii FTW!

I am not convinced of that. The vehicle in question looks way to thin to be a 9-7 and we all know the 9-7 won't be in production much longer at all. That combined with knowing the 9-4 will debut at Detroit it only makes sense.

We know the 08 Cobalt is getting refreshed, and Detroit is a Chevrolet show so that is where it will likely show up.

I was saying that it would likely be there.