HarleyEarl

Blu you are very close on two counts. I'm a little confused as to what it was called officially. I've seen it called the following: 1973 GM 2-Rotor 1973 Chevrolet XP-897GT (code name) 1973 Corvette 2-Rotor GMnext refers to it as the Corvette 2-Rotor It has a facinating story: http://wiki.gmnext.com/wiki/index.php/Corvette_2-Rotor

dwarf

Here's another view:

Paula Abdul (I luv Dean Martin and those Gold Diggers)

Sorry to hear of all your bad luck. Hope it turns around. I don't feel so sorry for myself now, just came home to a water leak in the house. It's nothing compared to your situations.

gold digger

Do you know what car this is?

clamato juice

I saw the strangest vehicle today. It was a Suzuki mini mini delivery van, smallest thing I ever saw.

I'm glad there will be a base model with the steel rims. I think too many have come to expect every car to be at premium level.

Cars were much simpler back then and expectations were not as high. Most now would not do without airconditioning, stereos, leather, power windows, power seats, sunroofs, abs, automatic transmissions, etc. Not to mention numerous gov't mandated safety equipment. It would be interesting to see the comparison of a car back then and now, feature for feature.

fart

tears

Look, it's not a criminal offense to have a really long title that is hard to read. It was just an idea to make the Topic Title page easier and faster to read. And I don't advocate a hard and fast rule.

Here's an example: Topic Title in long form: It Appears that Senator Hillary Clinton has chosen for her running mate for Vice President, Her Husband, former President, Bill Clinton A possible edited version: Hillary Clinton Picks Bill As Running Mate

Another idea is: Instead of a long, long main title, split it up into main and subtitle.

I find most forum Topic Titles are so long. It's like the whole story is in the title. Hard to read at a glance. Could we go with an unwritten rule keeping it to 5 words or less in the main title and subtitle? Think of what newspapers and magazines do with their titles. Just an idea. What do you think?

Ya, I noticed that too. This car looks so good from that overhead view.

If I get hard when a car goes by, it's beautiful.

http://www.worldcarfans.com/9080820.003/le...10-chevy-camaro

Definition of a beautiful car must be changing in some circles. The only two beautiful cars on this list are the Aston Martin and the Alfa Romeo. Most are interesting or assertive designs but not beautiful The Cadillac CTS is not beautiful. It's an attractive car, yes. Would I want to own one? Of course.

I got looking at that photo of yours and thinking, that is almost art....really like the cameras point of view. Most people take the same ol' standard on the ground shots. I think it's suitable for framing.

Depending what level you get, I like both coupe and sedan. Saw a Cobalt SS sedan today with the nice wheels....it looked very sharp.

Don't get me wrong, I luv the Enclave, but man, that Buick station wagon is so choice. So expressive. I wish cars of today would capture that 'thing' they used to have.

Doing the coffee thing has to be one of my favorite things. Do it almost every morning, read the papers, watch the people...great transition for the workday ahead. I go for the more upscale, trendier ones. Better muffins and pastries and better coffee. On the weekend, I look forward to just relaxing on a coffehouse patio, either alone or with friends...luv it.