Croc

Yea, and unibody. Don't forget unibody Fly!

But NOS, it isn't coming. JK!!! Though I will be laughing my ass off if the whole thing is a very elaborate hoax. You have to admit that would be funny as hell.

Wait didn't you say you had a scholarship? Colleges are expensive. USC is ridiculous, and even with my half tuition scholarship my college fund is still very much drained. Look this is what I tell everyone: if you want it badly enough you will find a way to make it happen.

But it would be funny as hell

there is a big difference between taking prescription drugs and abusing them. they ARE medicine...very powerful meds. They do help a lot of people and while I'm not trying to imply your family abused them or did anything criminal...they aren't "unsafe" and "bad" because they help a lot of people every day. You jsut have to treat them like the potent pills they are.

BTW did I mention Xanax? and keep it a secret from Marcia...ANYTHING can be used against you. Does she know about all the stuff you post on this site? I cannot remember if any of the softcore porn pics you posted were after the big meltdown or not, but if she goes on here and searches and finds all that stuff, better watch out. Or even the posts above where you mention your temper. Honesty is NOT something you need to be for these battles. Don't acknowledge the temper or rage blackouts or what have you.

Get some help. Rx Drugs work wonders. And you better be prepared for a long bloody custody fight. If Marcia wants Sofia so badly, she's gonna make you into a rage-prone nutcase and you are going to have to prove otherwise. She will drag out everything she can, especially if she says she "hates" you. No offense, but she might even bring up the infidelity. How are you going to counter that? You need to be prepared. Get a lawyer. Remember though that whatever custody agreement you work out will hamper career moves if you ever have any. You probably won't be able to live outside of your region without rewriting custody agreements. Child support? Yea...not fun. I really suggest a lawyer. And some Xanax.

are they gonna re-air it? FOX often did with that show...

Dude whatever no problems... Rodeo is stuck in everyones head out here I mean damn...no better place to drop a few lol

Saw a Ford Five Hundred on Fig last night. Very classy car.

What? I thought it was Miami? Dude I have no idea...let's get our crap together though...

sweet now im def gonna go to LA even if i have to WALK all the way up Fig...

Alright, now I'm thinking this is less of an elaborate hoax and something closer to being real. Good find Northie!

I'm with Northie. I cannot see SAAB styling being successful on Kappa.

dahhhhhh ive been waiting for that show to come back and what do you know i missed it! booooooo

I said it is the worst GM interior on the market. I don't really think it is any better than the GMT-800s, which as far as I'm concerned don't count now that the new ones are almost out. The GMT-800s were released in 1999. The G6 was released in 2004. Again, the concept shines because of its attention to detail, which is the main differentiator between it and the production G6, exterior-wise.

Fair enough...I don't read Motor Trash anyway...but as far as I'm concerned, great sales + upping production = SUCCESSFUL PRODUCT ...despite what any magazine tells you

It is off the GMT-355 because of better off-roading characteristics inherent to that platform. Engine upgrade coming in a year. Selling like hotcakes, so what exactly did GM do wrong?

^^ What he said ^^ No, the G6 doesn't look odd because it is missing any of those elements; it is just that the production version is so half-baked. The concept was great. GM costcutting just got in the way. The real reason so many of you like the G6 is that, yes, the design is cleaner (a good thing), but mainly that all the obvious cost-cutting doesn't bother you. It bothers a great deal of people though. I will go so far to say the G6 interior is currently the WORST GM interior on the market. The materials are just so subpar...it's like the car is telling you "this is what you get if you cannot afford a 9-3"! The G6 really was a missed opportunity. The exterior styling is more attractive than the Malibu...but the cheapo taillamps (really...even the 'bu has jeweled ones!), the very cheapo interior with its ONE piece of alumiplastic.....I mean just wow. The concept was so nice too. I mean c'mon.....there is VERY little about the above picture that would not be feasible for production!

:blink: :blink: G6 isn't design purity...it is design austerity. The exterior is completely bland not because it lacks the "fork marks" down the sides, but because there is hardly ANY detailing on the exterior. No surface interest. The taillamps are flat as can be as they lack a jeweled effect. Granted there is a rub strip and the hood has a couple character lines on it, but the rest of the car just lacks real body lines and anything to hold any interest. As far as telling BV he's too young to remember when Pontiacs looked good, first of all "good" is extremely subjective. Frankly, I think the Firebird/Trans Am models looked good even in their in-your-face, boy-racer glory. I think the 90s Sunfire looked good even though it was a POS Cavalier with better styling. I think the Montana was the best-looking of the U-bodies, and I think it looked good for a minivan. You mention the GP and Bonnie, with which I also agree. I think the 1999 N-body Grand AM looked pretty decent, too. What appeals to a 17 year old is different than a 40-something year old. You shouldn't put down his tastes just because they are different than yours. If you have to say "not to be ___ but..." then you probably shouldn't say it. Because it most likely is "___." ::puts on flamesuit and prepares for bitchy response(s)::

It's the taillights not being jeweled like a 90s Alero or the concept...instead using cheap early 90s plastic... It's the interior with all of its tacky plastic and uncohesive design... and its the lack of small exterior details... all of those contribute to the pathetic production version, with 90% going to the interior, 8% to the rear, and 2% for the exterior details. If the interior didn't suck so much it might be decent. BUT NO.

or maybe they just shouldn't promise them...what's worse, being late? or having a half-baked product at launch? obviously the latter...:rolleyes:

I don't really either. The ole metabolism just can't handle it... Plus, watching drunk people is even better than actually being drunk!

If it's Highlander sized or larger, than it really doesn't compete with the Equinox anymore...now does it?

Exteriors of new and old are pretty similar...so those are unoffensive. Interior looks a little chintzy though.