CanadianBacon94

shwamp

beverage

Tom and Jerry

testing... Edit: thanks

Solstice?

"...With my dashboard Jesus..." Lost Highway Bon Jovi Ipod picks this song on shuffle as soon as i got to this page, and i got to this line before laughing.

so according to this the TT V-6 could have more torque since it makes max power at 5600 RPM?

I have not seen a single word against the build quality of the CTS

why do you think the 3.0 is being phased out of some models? is there a decent weight loss 3.0 vs 3.6? and if the V is not a V-8 i will feel betrayed that gm decided against making its own car, and instead just copying a 3'er or a C

is there a way to put this into a sig?

light

for some strange reason i doubt the GTO can be considered in the same class as an ATS.

:confused0071: no sunroof, NO SUNROOF :cry: really i don't see the appeal of a sunroof, a car is surrounded by glass, and most of it will roll down. but yes 31k is a lot for a pretty mush base model. then again a "pretty much base" avalanche is mid 50K

i think the 8-speed should be a FWD transmission. i just don't see there being an actual improvement with an 8 vs. a 6 speed with this kind of torque. when your trying to push a two ton lacrosse with 182 hp there is a difference

dexter's

gouls

the CTS is probably the best looking car i have ever seen, or at least up there with Gallardo's and r8's. ant i dont expect the ATS to break the styling streak edit: :duh: that is the wrong quote at the top of the page it s supposed to be "The ATS is going into a segment no American car has ever had success in. "

what did they say when the 1st gen CTS came out?

"The ATS-V should be closer to $60k. If the regular ATS is in the $28-38k price range, it won't have the build quality the Germans have" just because something is cheaper to lure in new buyers doesn't mean its down on quality

Prius/hindsight

does that rear end remind anyone of a chevelle

do you think it will be on the site?

line

independent

funny but too bad its too true.