Bimmer325

The Venza is actually a head turner on the road. I saw a white one with the 20" wheels a few weeks ago and was definitely impressed.

Why doesn't it have a warranty?

YJ, $2.77 for cigarettes? Marlboros run in the $6-$7 range here. In NYC, they're a dollar or two more.

Yeah, I just realized that. Even the headlights are the same.

Looks uncomfortably close to the Volt. I hope this isn't a different front clip kind of deal, but it looks that way from this picture.

Something exactly like this could have been based on the outgoing C-class underpinnings and sold as the Sebring replacement. I see a lot of previous generation Sebring sedan in the rear, except not cheap looking.

I've already seen three or four 335d's around.

I was just about to ask...headed to the Detroit riverfront area with that plow? 6-10" forecasted for me.

I disagree. There's an element of cheapness in the new SRX's exterior that brings the chintzy BLS to mind. The RX looks more upscale and substantial, IMO. It doesn't reek of the impression that it's based on something cheaper.

Good move. I honestly couldn't see these selling.

http://jalopnik.com/5124488/pontiac-g8-st-...-el-caminoagain

gm4life, take a look at your signature and then ask yourself how much weight your argument holds.

A friend's '02 has had all of these problems, possibly including the tailgate cables as well. Not to mention the interior looks like crap after six years. Personally, I'd stay away, but that's just me. These trucks don't exude quality, that's for sure.

balthazar, you amaze me.

I didn't realize how cheap the 2010 SRX looks until I saw those pictures.

I call BS. It certainly doesn't look like it has just 1,100 miles and has been in storage since 1973.

GM is scrambling to make business moves they should have been making months and years ago. It's amazing that it took bankruptcy and the prospect of total collapse to get them into action. Rick Wagoner and other execs didn't have the foresight to see this coming before things got this bad? Before it got to the point where they would only have enough cash for a few months? They're reacting now because there's no other option, presenting a hastily prepared plan to stay afloat. I know nobody could have predicted roller coaster gas prices or the fall of the SUV. But members here have for years commented on GM's tendency to react to market trends rather than take a proactive approach. Why weren't "dead weight" brands being slashed or sold off before this?

Booooooooooring.

I can't remember the last time I saw a Buick commercial anyway, other than the ones advertising rebates.

Invested? GM has consistently done the bare minimum to keep Saab alive. You blame Saab because nobody wanted a rebadged Trailblazer, when in reality, it's GM's mismanagement that's failed the brand.

Wow. That looks great to me. I love the new front end. The grille, the angled headlights, the squared off hood. It looks more upscale--from this picture at least--than anything else in its class. I haven't been this impressed with a design from Ford in a long time. The midsection is still bland and the rear isn't as much as an improvement, but overall I'm impressed. Love the 5-spoke wheels. The interior looks dated, but I guess there was only so much they could do there. Definitely an upgrade.

The rear looks good. The front might take some getting used to. Overall, still one of the only exciting small cars.

Please. Go look at the pathetic G6 update and tell me Saab doesn't deserve to stick around.

The public education system in this country is broken, and this is evidence of that.