Bimmer325

I would buy a Camry before any G6.

This is one of GM's biggest problems. That interior is light years ahead of everything in Cadillac's lineup except for maybe the CTS. I wouldn't be surprised if it's dumbed down considerably for "American tastes." It's almost insulting that carmakers think every American wants a bargain basement interior in their car.

They slapped an Escalade front and the tired STS rear on it? This thing is pathetic.

Keep in mind the Invicta is still a concept. Compare a production model when it comes out to the TL and you might have a comparison.

This isn't the kind of vehicle GM needs right now, so I can't really make myself care.

Huge fan of the Flobots.

You doubt it ever played here? It's in spanish.

Range Rover headlights.

GM would be crazy not to dump Hummer, especially if there is someone dumb enough to want it.

Yes, because giving us a three-decade old design in an overweight, overpriced package (and an interior that could be shoved into any other Chrysler product) is EXACTLY what consumers want. I was over the Challenger in 1970.

Still has a 90s throwback vibe.

A substantial MCE is necessary if this thing is sticking around until 2012.

GM's latest offerings are more competent than ever, but they're not enough in a sea of cars that either reak of "old" GM or need to be replaced, redesigned, or cut. I'm talking about blatant rebadges like the Torrent, G5, outdated rental-queens like the Grand Prix (which was allowed by GM to gather dust on dealer lots for way too many years), and to a lesser extent, Impala. There are still cars that were left without enhancements that could have kept them relevant like the G6, 9-5, STS, DTS. Believe it or not, I would be interested in buying from Saab if its products were just a little closer to the top of their respective classes. You would never know Saab sells so few cars living in the Northeast, that's for sure. Saabs of every generation line the streets around here, and it's seems they only grow more popular the further into New England you go. I see more new 9-3's in a day in CT than I've seen at all in NY. Around here, driving a Saab says you're upscale, outdoorsy, yet unpretentious. Saabs are an acquired taste of sorts, an image I liken somewhat to Audi. Some say GM should dump it, but I can't imagine a brand like Pontiac next-door ever having such a favorable image, at least in the eyes of many people I know.

That looks like a Hyundai Sonata.

I use P21S Carnauba Wax. I try to stay away from "sealer" waxes, as I've heard using them regularly can be harmful. A coat of P21S doesn't last as long as a coat of sealer wax, but it's hard to beat in terms of looks and can be used regularly.

In what sense?

Another white BMW 135i. Probably my next car. I saw a new Vibe the other day, but not a single G8 yet. The Vibe looks OK, nothing spectacular.

IIRC, Buick dealers sell an average of 3 cars per month each. Regardless, I seriously doubt Mitsubishi is going anywhere.

Smart dealership just opened in Fairfield. I've seen two in the past few days.

Just paid $4 even for Premium. I don't usually whine about gas prices, just an observation.

I think that's the point. Why go for the CTS when a larger RWD wagon can be had for $10k less?

Is that push-button start I see? B)

I think it's thoroughly modern, well-proportioned, and upscale-looking in a way that no other midsizer can seem to manage. Overall, it looks like a quantam leap over the design of the current Aura, which hasn't dated well IMO. The side profile shot even reminds me of the XF.

This will be the most competent midsize sedan in GM's stable when it arrives. Why all the complaints?